Cutting Construction & Labor Costs Without Compromising the Brand

At RetailSpaces, we host candid, off-the-record discussions on the real challenges facing retail development leaders. These sessions have always been closed-door and unrecorded — until now.

Thanks to AI note-taking (and a promise of anonymity), we were able to capture one of these conversations without compromising what makes them valuable.

In Miami, design and construction leaders from grocery, sporting goods, big-box, footwear, and apparel came together to tackle a major challenge: cutting construction and labor costs without sacrificing the brand.

What followed was an honest look at remodel strategies, supplier dynamics, permitting roadblocks, and the constant tension between budgets and brand standards.

Here’s a look at the ideas, workarounds, and open questions that came out of the room:

Scaling Without Breaking the Brand

Leaders shared how operating large portfolios adds complex layers to cost control:

• One retailer with 3,700+ stores is juggling seven design generations across mall and off-mall locations. The goal: define a scalable, consistent standard that supports growth and experience.
• Others shared similar constraints, balancing massive capital envelopes while redeveloping concepts and managing rising build costs.
• Dealer-based models bring added tension—dealers front the build cost but must meet corporate design specs, requiring careful cost control.

Across the board, construction costs have soared, pushing teams to define non-negotiables and explore value engineering without eroding experience.

Brand Consistency vs. Budget Reality

Design teams are walking a tightrope between vision and value:

• Maintaining consistency across formats and generations is a challenge, especially when leadership wants bold statements late in the game.
• The infamous last-minute executive request ("can we paint the ceiling two days before opening?") was called out as a recurring cost-driver.
• Retailers debated whether certain finishes (like ceiling paint or tile) really impact customer experience—or just blow budgets.

Smaller format stores and refreshes are seen as opportunities to make impactful updates without full remodels. The key is knowing which elements truly matter.

Smart Value Engineering & Trade-offs

Teams are embracing an iterative, test-and-learn approach to cutting costs:

• One tactic: "Take it away until you hit the budget... then see what really needs to come back."
• Durability matters. Many are opting for materials with higher upfront costs and longer lifespans (like tile vs. DCT).
• Having clear alignment on what’s sacred (brand-wise) vs. flexible helps simplify decisions.

Some teams report into finance, and leverage CFO support to challenge assumptions and adjust non-negotiables when ROI isn’t there.

Vendor Collaboration & Right-Sizing Specs

Retailers discussed how better communication and early involvement with vendors can reduce waste:

• Signage vendors have warned retailers of over-engineering: national specs are often more complex than needed.
• Cost increases in steel and other materials are hitting signage and tile hard—but volume aggregation and buy groups can help.
• Suppliers urged teams to loop them in early for value-engineering alternatives within product families.

Right-sizing specs without sacrificing intent was a recurring theme.

Aligning Teams Around the Store Experience

Breakout discussions revealed misalignment between teams:

• Construction teams focus on ceilings, design teams on floors, and merchants on what’s in between.
• The result? Conflicting priorities during walkthroughs and inconsistent decision-making.

Leaders stressed the need for early alignment between design, construction, and merchandising—especially when pursuing lighter-touch updates or experimental formats like pop-ups.

Pop-Ups, Market-Driven Adaptations & Surprises

Sometimes, the best ideas come from unexpected constraints:

• A fire forced one retailer into a pop-up format using a former dressing room. It outperformed expectations.
• In tourist markets, lower-investment concepts still succeed if they’re fun, different, and profitable.

This reinforced the idea that market context should shape design standards. Not every store needs to be a flagship.

Refrigeration, Regulation & Risk

For retailers dealing with refrigeration-heavy footprints, new mandates are adding serious cost and complexity.

• Starting January 1, new builds must comply with updated refrigerant regulations, requiring additional sensors, fire alarms, and other systems — all on a tight timeline.
• Some states, like California and Washington, are moving faster than federal guidance, adding another layer of urgency.
• CO2 transitions bring maintenance concerns, from part availability to technician training. One missed detail can lead to costly downtime or product loss.

Procurement delays came up as well, particularly in rural markets. Canadian teams noted that lead times there were up to 10 times faster than in the U.S.

Backup power was another area of focus, with teams exploring everything from full-building generators to more targeted, component-level solutions.

Budgeting, Contracts & Execution Pressure

Cost-cutting isn’t just about specs—it’s about process:

• Teams are pushing to rework contract structures and better manage GCs and owner’s reps.
• There’s growing tension between launching initiatives and realistically resourcing them.
• End-of-year execution still lags due to inconsistent on-site coverage and vendor bandwidth.

Open Questions & Lingering Risks

• How can brands reduce cost across massive fleets without gutting customer experience?
• What's the right framework for lifecycle vs. upfront cost decisions?
• Will refrigerant rules hit remodels next, and how do we stay ahead?
• Can teams align better on what truly matters across design, construction, and merchandising?
• Is it time to rethink the threshold for store standards in different market contexts?
  
  

Want to join the next conversation?
Request an invite to RetailSpaces →